jammer

Axon Enterprise, a Taser manufacturer based in Scottsdale, Arizona, has recently finalized a deal to acquire Dedrone, a company located in Sterling that specializes in the production of drone-jamming and detection devices.

The companies announced on Monday that the transaction is anticipated to conclude in the latter half of 2024, with no disclosure of the deal's terms.

Dedrone’s portable gunlike drone jammer can thwart aerial drones by disrupting communications links with targeted radio pulses. The company has worked with police departments, the U.S. Army and other military and commercial clients. Dedrone has partnered with the Ukrainian government to provide nearly 300 sensors capable of identifying and detecting radio signatures of nearly 250 different models of drones, according to Dedrone’s website. It has also sent riflelike devices to Ukraine that have been used to jam Russian drones, according to The New York Times.

Dedrone utilizes artificial intelligence and machine learning to offer a constant and independent process of questioning and validating drones. Its technology is capable of identifying and deterring unauthorized drones in various locations, including military bases, airports, and public events.

Axon, previously recognized as Taser International, is most famous for its Taser products, along with body cameras, dash cameras, and cloud-based digital evidence management systems. The company serves clients in the first responder sector, including local, state, and federal law enforcement personnel.

The acquisition of Dedrone will enhance Axon's capacity to assist clients in securing their communities, enhancing their response to crucial incidents, and safeguarding additional lives across various locations, as stated in the news release issued by the companies.

Axon founder and CEO Rick Smith stated that by merging Axon's 30-year history of innovation with Dedrone's state-of-the-art airspace security solutions, they intend to transform public safety once more. Smith emphasized that their collaboration will speed up the development of a more sophisticated end-to-end drone solution that allows beneficial drones to operate while preventing harmful ones from doing so.

In 2017, Taser International underwent a rebranding and changed its name to Axon. Axon's revenue increased by 34% in the first quarter of 2024, with recurring revenue reaching $825 million.

In a statement, Dedrone CEO Aaditya Devarakonda emphasized that Dedrone's influence is expanding in various sectors, including federal governments, utilities, critical infrastructure, event venues, airports, correctional facilities, and other enterprises. This, combined with Axon's robust network of interconnected devices and software, will position us as leaders in safeguarding not just our communities but also the security of nations worldwide.

The NFL and federal law enforcement are on high alert for unauthorized drones after one caused a play stoppage at a playoff game two weeks ago.

Super Bowl LVIII will feature a tough defensive scheme that has nothing to do with a football. This one is about stopping drones.

The NFL and federal law enforcement officials are taking a hard line Sunday to keep players and fans safe from unauthorized drones at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas where the Kansas City Chiefs will play the San Francisco 49ers.

Unapproved drone flights have become a persistent problem for the NFL, as well as for other sports leagues and large public gatherings. The NFL said there were about 2,500 drone incursions near stadiums during the 2022-2023 season, an increase of about 90% from a year earlier.

The flights have sometimes encroached on televised broadcasts, including two weeks ago at the AFC championship game in Baltimore when an unapproved drone violated the restricted airspace. Federal prosecutors later charged a Pennsylvania drone pilot who said, according to the FBI, that he wasn’t aware of the flight restrictions.

Possible criminal charges and civil penalties await anyone trying something similar Sunday, officials said.

“So please leave your drone at home,” Cathy Lanier, the NFL’s chief security officer, said at a news conference Wednesday.

Most of the drones are operated by hobbyists seeking aerial video, according to experts, but especially at a high-profile event such as the Super Bowl, authorities said they’re also looking out for people with more nefarious intentions.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said the incident two weeks ago was a warning.

“It does not require much imagination to understand the significant threat such an incident could pose,” he said at the news conference Wednesday. Although no one was hurt in that incident, he said, “what happened in Baltimore underscores the vital importance of the mission.”

Mayorkas added that there were no known credible specific threats to the Super Bowl or Las Vegas.

Federal law enforcement designates the Super Bowl as a top-tier security event, on roughly the same level as a presidential inauguration ceremony or a visit by the pope. Allegiant Stadium, where the teams will play, has a capacity of about 65,000 people.

Any stadium’s defense against drones has multiple layers, said Mary-Lou Smulders, chief marketing officer for Dedrone, a Virginia-based company. Its drone countermeasure technology is in use by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, which covers Las Vegas and its major stadiums.

“Like any security issue, the more layers you add, the safer you are,” she said. “The same applies to airspace security.”

The first layers, she said, are all designed to detect and track drones using at least three types of technology: radio-frequency sensors, cameras and radar. They have different strengths, she added: Radio-frequency sensors can distinguish between drones and other objects better than radar, while radar has a longer range and a camera can help determine if a drone is carrying a payload.

With a camera, Smulders said, “the most interesting thing to ask is: Is it carrying a payload, yes or no?” If it were, that “would dramatically affect your security posture.”

A second set of layers is designed to interfere with a drone’s flight, she said: “cell phone jammer jamming” or cutting off the radio communication between a drone and its pilot; hacking into a drone to take over control; and locating the pilot on the ground and arresting the person.

drone jammer Jamming and hacking are not usually available as security tools for an NFL game. Federal law restricts who can interfere with a drone’s flight, and in the United States, only a few government agencies including the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have the authority to do so. Congress is considering legislation to change that but, for now, the federal government provides agents for high-profile events like the Super Bowl but not for a game on any given Sunday.

At a regular season game in Baltimore in November, play was delayed twice because of drone activity.

The NFL game stoppages are helping raise the profile of drone countermeasures, a growing industry that experts say will become more important as drone technology improves and becomes cheaper.

Allegiant Stadium has one advantage over Baltimore’s: It’s a domed stadium, with a roof to shield the game from anything overhead. But it’s not completely enclosed, Smulders noted: The stadium has 80-foot walls that are retractable if weather allows. The doors have usually been closed during games.

Still, the NFL is on higher alert for drones than it used to be. In 2017, a California man used a modified drone to drop leaflets on the 49ers stadium, authorities said. He then drove to nearby Oakland and did the same at a Raiders game. He later pleaded guilty and was sentenced to probation.

For Sunday, the Federal Aviation Administration has banned drones within a radius of 30 nautical miles (about 35 miles) of the stadium beginning one hour before kickoff. There have also been restrictions in place for additional events in Las Vegas the past few days.

Lanier has previously told NBC News that the NFL had a close call at the Super Bowl in Atlanta in February 2019, when an FBI team spotted a drone just before six Air Force F-16s were set to conduct a flyover before the game. The F-16s flew at a higher altitude to avoid a possible collision, she said.

Drones have left an indelible mark on the Ukraine war, unlike any other conflict, as they range from small quadcopters equipped with cameras and grenades hovering over front-line trenches to aerial bombs carrying warheads weighing several dozen kilograms (pounds) into Kyiv and Moscow.

Over the past few months, Kyiv and other major cities have faced a series of attacks from Russian forces, who have deployed Iranian-manufactured Shahed "kamikaze" drones. In response, Ukraine has also carried out unmanned assaults in Crimea and the Russian border region of Belgorod.

On Tuesday, the Russian government went as far as accusing Ukraine of launching an attack on Moscow using these very devices.

The current image starkly contrasts with the excessive excitement that once surrounded the Turkish-manufactured Bayraktar TB2 drones during the initial stages of the conflict.

The aircraft garnered significant attention and received accolades in music for their contribution in dismantling Moscow's armored columns and the flagship of the Black Sea fleet, the Moskva.

However, the ongoing conflict has rendered these models, referred to as MALE (Medium Altitude, Long Endurance), obsolete.

According to an anonymous source from the European defense industry, the front line has now reached a state of stability and has become impervious due to the deployment of Russian defense systems to counter airborne attacks, as reported by AFP.

The drone war has now transformed into a battle of statistics.

According to a senior French military source, the majority of suicide drones are intercepted by air defenses, which are strategically employed to compel the defenders to engage their missiles and deplete their reserves.

“You also create terror and uncertainty at all times. Over the long term, that has value,” the source added.

It is crucial for Russia to degrade enemy air defense systems at a low cost, as highlighted by analysts Jack Watling and Nick Reynolds from the British defense think-tank RUSI in a recent report. Russia's production of long-range missiles is currently limited to approximately 40 per month.

According to reports, the air force of Moscow deploys a significant number of aircraft to expand the range of potential threats and to detect vulnerabilities in the Ukrainian air defense system. This strategy aims to identify areas where conventional missiles could penetrate.

According to the European industrial source, Kyiv utilizes commercially available Chinese propeller-powered drones or old Soviet jet-powered reconnaissance drones to carry out attacks deep within Russian territory.

– Front lines –

Most drones in use are compact models deployed for reconnaissance and offensive operations on the battlefield.

Ukrainian forces have shared numerous videos on various social media platforms depicting altered commercially accessible drones releasing explosives on Russian troops' locations.

It is common to find between 25 and 50 UAVs from each side on a 10-kilometre front line, as stated by RUSI's Watling and Reynolds.

Ukrainian Furia and Russian Eleron-3 drones are designed for specific purposes and can cover distances of up to 50 kilometers. In contrast, commercially modified quadcopters, often purchased through crowdfunding, have a limited range of less than 10 kilometers.

The deployment of electronic defenses by both sides has been prompted by the swarms, resulting in a reduction in the cost of countering inexpensive devices that are not worth shooting down with expensive missiles.

According to RUSI, the Russian forces currently utilize around one significant electronic warfare system for every 10 kilometers of frontage. Furthermore, there are additional, more specialized electronic warfare capabilities that are deployed higher up in the chain of command.

The senior French officer expressed that the Russians have intensified their electronic warfare tactics, signifying a significant shift in their approach.

Russian platoons are now outfitted with anti-drone weapons, as stated by RUSI, which include directional jammers and arrays designed to hijack UAVs drone jammer.

Anti-drone “rifles” that emit jamming signals are “the absolute basics of defence, what really works are non-portable jammers deployed close to the front line”, the European industry source said signal jammer.

However, these "large spheres mounted on tripods with generators" are easily identifiable and have a short lifespan, according to their statement.

– High attrition –

The French officer described drone and anti-drone warfare as a modern iteration of combined arms combat.

Similar to the presence of infantry, cavalry, and artillery, we also possess drones, electronic warfare, and connectivity.

The officer emphasized that due to the extensive efforts made to destroy them, the majority of small drones will not remain airborne for more than four to six instances before being intercepted and shot down.

Ukraine has claimed that they are experiencing a significant loss of approximately 10,000 drones every month across their extensive range of devices. However, the accuracy of this figure cannot be confirmed, and it is speculated that this statement may be an attempt to secure additional aid from Western nations.

In the event of breakthroughs and counter-offensives leading to the resurgence of quickly changing front lines, drones will continue to be significant.

Ukraine has the potential to employ drones in eliminating Russian defensive obstacles during its anticipated summer offensive, such as utilizing them to deliver explosives into a minefield, effectively creating a passage, as suggested by Vikram Mittal, a faculty member at the US military institution West Point, in an article for Forbes.

In situations where fast-moving troops become isolated, drones could provide a solution for delivering essential supplies like ammunition to ensure their operations can carry on.

Russian vehicles have been equipped with homemade drone-jammer, as reported. In a retaliatory move, the Ukrainians have been employing drones to destroy these jammers.

Ukrainian drones have instilled a sense of fear among Russian marines, and rightfully so. Russian troops are employing various tactics to bring down, neutralize and deflect these dangerous drones.

While improvisation can yield positive results, it is not a foolproof method. It has become increasingly evident that Russian military personnel are equipping their tanks and combat vehicles with small RP-377 radio-jammers, which are designed to impede the signals that trigger radio-controlled roadside bombs, with the aim of obstructing the signals that govern high-speed first-person-view drones.

It is becoming more and more evident that RP-377 is not effective against FPV drones. Social media is filled with darkly-ironic videos that depict Ukrainian drones destroying Russian vehicles that have do-it-yourself drone-jammers installed.

Thematically, the videos exhibit similarities to those illustrating Ukrainian forces obliterating Russian GPS-jammers by means of GPS-guided bombs, as you might have surmised.

A Russian naval infantry brigade, either the 155th or 40th Brigade, faces a challenge with drones, as evidenced by an ungraceful T-80BVM tank. The tank has been outfitted with do-it-yourself cage armor that could hinder the turret's rotation, but it may also provide some safeguard against explosive drones.

Adding to the tank's peculiarity is the RP-377 radio-jammer, which is securely mounted on its rearmost cage armor. Crafted by the Kremlin, this portable jammer
was designed to interfere with enemy communications and provide protection to infantry and vehicles against improvised explosive devices.

The utilization of IEDs presents a major obstacle in Russia's irregular warfare endeavors, particularly in conflict zones like Syria. Conversely, in Ukraine, where the majority of the fighting involves regular forces, the prominence of IEDs is considerably lower.

On the Ukraine front line, more and more Russian vehicles are being equipped with RP-377s attached to their hulls. The purpose of these jammers is unlikely to be the prevention of IEDs. It appears that the Russians are banking on the RP-377s to take down drones.

Radio-jamming poses an equal threat to both remote IEDs and drones in principle. The Russian troops deployed in the Eastern Military District conducted tests in 2020 and reported that their RP-377s played a crucial role in suppressing unmanned aerial vehicles.

It is worth noting that a significant number of drones are equipped with frequency-hopping controls or autopilots, which effectively neutralize the adverse effects of radio-jamming. As a result, there have been numerous instances where drone strikes have successfully targeted vehicles that were equipped with add-on RP-377s.

An ironic incident occurred a few weeks ago when a Ukrainian FPV drone collided with a Russian BMP fighting vehicle that had an RP-377 installed on it.

Drone technology is an emerging and versatile domain that finds applications in diverse areas, ranging from military and public safety to logistics and home services. The most notable aspect of drone technology is its autonomy and control, enabling drones to independently navigate their flight paths and fulfill assigned missions without human intervention. Furthermore, drones possess inherent advantages in terms of flexibility and intelligence, as they can automatically adapt to varying environments, avoid obstacles, and execute tasks with adaptability.

The technical principle behind the UAV counter-gun involves the integration of UAV and counter-gun technology, enabling remote control and counter-gun attacks. This cutting-edge technology offers the flexibility to adjust the countermeasure gun according to mission requirements, allowing for targeted shooting against specific targets. Additionally, the uav jammer countermeasure gun harnesses the UAV's adaptability and intelligence to automatically adapt to diverse environmental conditions, ensuring accurate targeting and effective prevention of criminal activities.

The applications of drone countermeasure gun technology are vast, with significant implications for public safety and military operations. In the realm of public security, drones can be effectively employed to conduct comprehensive searches of crime scenes, monitor police activities, promptly identify potential criminals, enhance police efficiency, deter criminal activities, and mitigate their escalation. In the military domain, the utilization of UAV counter-gun technology can greatly enhance combat efficiency by enabling timely detection of enemy forces and precise implementation of counter-gun shooting, thereby minimizing the losses incurred during warfare.

The field of UAV countermeasure gun technology is rapidly evolving, presenting numerous opportunities. Its ability to effectively deter crime, minimize gun-related offenses, and ensure the safety of individuals is unparalleled. Additionally, in military applications, UAV countermeasure guns can greatly enhance combat efficiency, effectiveness, and contribute to a more robust fight against terrorism. As technology continues to advance, drone countermeasure gun technology will undoubtedly make remarkable progress, bringing forth greater advantages for both society and the military.

A gun-shaped device that emits electromagnetic interference is commonly referred to as a drone countermeasure gun

The tranquility of the event site was abruptly shattered by the sudden intrusion of an unidentified drone, causing a significant disturbance to the game's proceedings. Subsequently, my attention was captivated by the presence of a state-of-the-art silver-gray drone countermeasure gun, measuring approximately one meter in length, which possessed the capability to swiftly eliminate the opponent with a single shot.

Instead of breaking apart, the drone gracefully descended and landed on the ground. The weapon operates by emitting electromagnetic interference waves ranging from 2.4GHz to 5.8GHz, which effectively disrupts the connection between the remote control jamming device and the drone. This method proves particularly successful as most drone remote controls operate within this specific frequency range.

By utilizing the activated UAV countermeasure gun, one can effectively control the movement of long-distance low-altitude UAVs within the designated "control area". With a range of 1,000 meters, this firearm can compel these UAVs to either descend, return to the operator, or smoothly descend in a short period of time, achieving optimal control over their flight.

Drone technology is an emerging and versatile domain that finds applications in diverse areas, ranging from military and public safety to logistics and home services. The most notable aspect of drone technology is its autonomy and control, enabling drones to independently navigate their flight paths and fulfill assigned missions without human intervention. Furthermore, drones possess inherent advantages in terms of flexibility and intelligence, as they can automatically adapt to varying environments, avoid obstacles, and execute tasks with adaptability.

The technical principle behind the UAV counter-gun involves the integration of UAV and counter-gun technology, enabling remote control and counter-gun attacks. This cutting-edge technology offers the flexibility to adjust the countermeasure gun according to mission requirements, allowing for targeted shooting against specific targets. Additionally, the uav jammer countermeasure gun harnesses the UAV's adaptability and intelligence to automatically adapt to diverse environmental conditions, ensuring accurate targeting and effective prevention of criminal activities.

The applications of drone countermeasure gun technology are vast, with significant implications for public safety and military operations. In the realm of public security, drones can be effectively employed to conduct comprehensive searches of crime scenes, monitor police activities, promptly identify potential criminals, enhance police efficiency, deter criminal activities, and mitigate their escalation. In the military domain, the utilization of UAV counter-gun technology can greatly enhance combat efficiency by enabling timely detection of enemy forces and precise implementation of counter-gun shooting, thereby minimizing the losses incurred during warfare.

The field of UAV countermeasure gun technology is rapidly evolving, presenting numerous opportunities. Its ability to effectively deter crime, minimize gun-related offenses, and ensure the safety of individuals is unparalleled. Additionally, in military applications, UAV countermeasure guns can greatly enhance combat efficiency, effectiveness, and contribute to a more robust fight against terrorism. As technology continues to advance, drone countermeasure gun technology will undoubtedly make remarkable progress, bringing forth greater advantages for both society and the military.

A gun-shaped device that emits electromagnetic interference is commonly referred to as a drone countermeasure gun

The tranquility of the event site was abruptly shattered by the sudden intrusion of an unidentified drone, causing a significant disturbance to the game's proceedings. Subsequently, my attention was captivated by the presence of a state-of-the-art silver-gray drone countermeasure gun, measuring approximately one meter in length, which possessed the capability to swiftly eliminate the opponent with a single shot.

Instead of breaking apart, the drone gracefully descended and landed on the ground. The weapon operates by emitting electromagnetic interference waves ranging from 2.4GHz to 5.8GHz, which effectively disrupts the connection between the remote control jamming device and the drone. This method proves particularly successful as most drone remote controls operate within this specific frequency range.

By utilizing the activated UAV countermeasure gun, one can effectively control the movement of long-distance low-altitude UAVs within the designated "control area". With a range of 1,000 meters, this firearm can compel these UAVs to either descend, return to the operator, or smoothly descend in a short period of time, achieving optimal control over their flight.

ASSERTION: A colossal, glowing skeleton was erected above passersby in an open square near the Burj Khalifa using drones as part of a Halloween exhibit.

The claim that the video is authentic is false. According to experts, there are clear indications that the "drone show" is a fake, such as its speed, which exceeds the current capabilities of drone technology. Furthermore, the audience below the skeleton does not respond to the massive spectacle above them signal jamming.

It has been widely circulated on social media since Halloween that a video showed a nighttime display that almost reached the height of the Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest building.

Within the brief 8-second video, a formation of illuminated drones creates the appearance of a skeleton. This drone skeleton gracefully moves forward, suspended directly above the pedestrians who are leisurely strolling around an open-air plaza adjacent to Dubai Mall, a renowned shopping destination. Notably, the skeleton's height almost mirrors the towering skyscraper, measuring an impressive 2,716 feet and 6 inches (828 meters) drone jammer.

One TikTok post that shared the video stated, "Dubai's #Halloween drone show takes a chilling twist as a haunting skeleton appears in the sky." As of Friday, the video had garnered around 8.5 million views.

Other individuals added a political twist to the alarming demonstration, such as a message on X, previously known as Twitter, that declares: "During Halloween, the UAE organizes a remarkable drone simulation featuring a colossal skeleton at Burj Khalifa in Dubai. This choice has provoked anger among numerous Muslim nations, who perceive Halloween as a 'satanic holiday' coinciding with the tragic occurrences in Gaza."

However, various specialists have informed The Associated Press that the video does not truly portray a structure constructed from drones.

Preston Ward, the chief pilot and general counsel for Sky Elements Drone Shows in Fort Worth, Texas, confidently stated that the display was completely fabricated. He not only exposed the falsehood on social media but also emphasized its fraudulent nature.

Ward highlighted several indications in the video suggesting that the skeleton is not as it appears. Firstly, it exhibits an excessive speed that surpasses the capabilities of current drone technology. Additionally, the estimated 2,000 drones involved in the display emit an unexpectedly low level of noise. Lastly, there is an improbable flawlessness in the overall presentation.

He expressed, "The appearance seems excessively flawless, as well. There will always be some room for error. In a live performance, there will always be some element of unpredictability. Moreover, all their hues appear identical, and the illuminations possess an identical radiance."

Furthermore, Ryan Sigmon, co-founder of Firefly Drone Shows in Detroit, concurs that operating drones above pedestrians in a densely populated vicinity, as depicted in the video, poses a significant safety risk. He also acknowledges that the skeleton portrayed in the footage lacks authenticity.

Apart from the technological and logistical considerations, there seems to be a lack of reaction from anyone in the video towards the massive structure hovering above them. It is quite unusual that this is the only video available online from the supposed show, especially considering the prevalence of smartphones in today's age. Furthermore, there have been no announcements or advertisements regarding any such show taking place in Dubai.

The origin of the video remains unknown, but it was shared on TikTok by Geoscan Group, a drone show production company, on Tuesday and garnered millions of views. Despite being contacted for comment, Geoscan has not responded, and the video has since been removed from their TikTok account as of Friday.

___

As part of its endeavor to combat the dissemination of false information, AP is actively collaborating with external entities to provide accurate context to deceptive content that is being circulated on the internet. To gain further insights into AP's fact-checking initiatives, please explore additional information on fact-checking at AP.

According to an official statement, a US Reaper drone was downed by Houthi rebels backed by Iran in the vicinity of Yemen.

According to a defense official, Houthi forces have successfully shot down an unmanned US military drone near the Yemeni coast. This incident was reported by CNN.

According to the official, the MQ-9 Reaper drone was operating in international airspace and over international waters at the time it was shot down. The incident is currently being investigated by US Central Command.

The shootdown, for which the Iran-backed Houthi militants assumed responsibility on Wednesday, took place a few weeks after the USS Carney, a US Navy warship, intercepted a series of missiles and drones fired by the Houthis as they were moving northward along the Red Sea. As reported by CNN, the ship successfully neutralized four cruise missiles and 15 drones within a nine-hour timeframe. The clear trajectory of these weapons left little room for speculation regarding their destination, which was evidently Israel.

In the wake of Hamas' assault on Israel, Iranian proxy factions have intensified their assaults on US forces and properties in the Middle East. Over the past few weeks, there have been approximately 40 attacks on US and coalition bases in Iraq and Syria, resulting in minor injuries including traumatic brain injuries among several US servicemembers, as confirmed by officials.

The attacks on US forces in the region have been attributed to Iran by a senior defense official who referred to the country as "the center of gravity". The official also stated that the evidence points to Iranian involvement in the attacks.

On October 26, the United States responded to the actions of certain groups by conducting airstrikes in Syria. The airstrikes specifically targeted the infrastructure that was being utilized by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its associated groups. To carry out these strikes, an F-15 fighter jet and a pair of F-16 fighter jets were deployed, employing precision-guided munitions. The primary objective was to neutralize a weapons and ammunition storage facility located in Abu Kamal, which is situated near the border separating Syria and Iraq.

CNN has informed that Iran is aiming to take advantage of the negative response towards the US backing of Israel. Although Tehran may not be directly instructing the groups' assaults, it does seem to be promoting them.

After the retaliatory strikes in Syria last month, the US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin delivered a stern caution to Tehran.

The statement released by Austin suggests that Iran may be involved in the recent attacks against our forces. However, we believe in maintaining open channels of communication with all nations and will continue to engage in dialogue with Iran to address any concerns. We remain committed to protecting our forces and will take necessary measures to ensure their safety.

Referred to as a bombing drone, this unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is specifically engineered to execute drone strikes. It is categorized under combat drones, which encompass a range of functions including target acquisition, surveillance, reconnaissance, and intelligence gathering.

Even though bomber drones lack human presence, they are not entirely automated. Rather, they are usually controlled by humans in real-time from a distant location.

Clearly, there is a substantial decrease in weight when compared to regular aircraft, as the presence of a human pilot and their associated needs are completely irrelevant in this scenario.

Here is a succinct examination of stealth bombers and the intricacies involved in neutralizing these military aircraft.

Debunking the Myth of Detecting Stealth Bomber Drones.

In an ideal scenario, bomber drones would exemplify the true essence of stealth. As one can envision, this implies evading detection from targets completely. Any potential compromise could lead to an unsuccessful conclusion of an ongoing mission.

The US Air Force's RQ-170 is a notable example of a compromise. In December 2011, an RQ-170 crashed on the Iran-Afghanistan border, and the Iranians promptly retrieved the debris to start developing their own version of the technology.

The RQ-180's creation is attributed not just to the capacity to duplicate but also to the aptitude to refine the initial blueprint. These unmanned aerial vehicles are meant to be covert surveillance drones, but what does the concept of "stealth" entail in this scenario?

When it comes to drone stealth, many individuals primarily consider its capability to elude radar detection. Although satellites possess comprehensive visibility, their inflexible operational nature restricts adaptability, thereby contributing to the integration of detection avoidance mechanisms in specific designs.

Radar technology operates in a straightforward manner. It sends out a signal that reflects off an aircraft, revealing its position and allowing for tracking capabilities.

Nonetheless, the complexity escalates when it comes to drones that have a reduced size, thus giving rise to the notion of their ability to remain undetected.

The problem with this misconception is that it overlooks the significance of radio frequencies. Undeniably, achieving autonomous control requires a certain level of communication based on frequencies. However, it is important to note that these frequencies can be disrupted using the appropriate technology.

Nonetheless, pursuing this method does pose a greater challenge as opposed to solely utilizing radar identification to detect drones.

In order to render a bombing drone inoperable, what items would be necessary?

Under the classification of equipment here, there are two distinct categories: drone detection and drone disruption. The former is concerned with the identification of drones, while the latter concentrates on disabling the detected drones.

The Leading Four Technologies for Countering Unmanned Aerial Systems.

Drones have the potential to jeopardize human health and safety, as well as security. Furthermore, they are frequently utilized for spying and obtaining delicate information from protected areas, such as military bases, and can cause harm by transporting explosives.

The counter-drone technology sector has been making great strides, especially in the military arena. To discover the four most sought-after counter UAS technologies, keep reading.

Webs

To apprehend drones, militaries often rely on this drone detection solution. When the net successfully captures a drone, it immediately immobilizes it, causing it to descend to the ground. This efficient method not only prevents the drone from returning to its sender but also safeguards against the risk of sensitive information being compromised or, even worse, the potential for physical damage resulting from any explosives it may be carrying.

The use of nets to capture drones has several benefits, such as a reduced likelihood of harm to the sender or innocent bystanders from explosions. Furthermore, the sender can be located and held accountable with the help of nets. The accuracy of ground-based net launchers is also noteworthy.

A disadvantage of using drone deployed nets is the considerable amount of time it takes to reload them. Consequently, if there are multiple drones or if the initial attempt fails to capture the target, the threat persists.

Radar

The utilization of radio energy enables radar to effectively locate objects. Thanks to radars, the precise direction and position of a drone can be measured. Most radars emit a radio signal and then analyze the resulting echo. However, they have limited capability in detecting small targets. Initially, radars were designed to track larger objects such as passenger aircraft. Nevertheless, military organizations also employ radars to locate smaller drones that may potentially be in the vicinity.

Benefits: Radars offer extensive coverage of large terrains and deliver accurate positioning data, enabling the simultaneous detection of multiple targets. In order to maintain a stringent defense posture regardless of adverse weather conditions, radars prove to be an optimal solution, even in scenarios characterized by poor visibility such as fog, nighttime, and others.

Disadvantage: Small drones and small flying animals like bats or birds are indistinguishable to most radars. This makes radars less efficient for military use, as they may fail to detect small drones.

High Power Microwave (HPM)

Drones are vulnerable to the disruptive effects of High Power Microwave devices. The HPM's electromagnetic waves can interfere with the radio signals that control a drone's movements, making it difficult or impossible to steer. Additionally, the high voltage and currents of the HPM can cause damage to the drone's electronic components, rendering it inoperable. This makes the HPM a valuable tool for neutralizing drones in situations where they pose a threat.

Benefits: Capable of effectively ceasing drones that are situated within the HPM coverage area.

While this technology offers protection to military bases and highly secured areas, it carries the risk of unintentionally damaging and even destroying other electronic devices. Furthermore, HPM can disrupt communication signals as well.

GPS Spoofer

This technology enables the transmission of a signal to the detected suspicious drone, effectively misleading it about its current location. Through the dynamic alerting of GPS coordinates, the spoofer gains control over the drone, facilitating its removal to a designated "safe zone." As a result, the presence of the drone is mitigated, reducing the associated risks.

Benefits: One of the major advantages of GPS spoofers is their affordability, making them accessible for armies to procure in larger quantities and utilize in multiple locations.

Disadvantage: Sadly, there is a downside of potentially disrupting other radio communication signals.

By analyzing the potential risks, the system operator concludes that electronic methods, particularly soft-kill tactics like frequency drone jamming, can effectively neutralize the UAV threat.

gps jamming refers to the targeted emission of concentrated RF power towards the frequency channels employed by the Drone for telemetric, control, and navigation functions. The effective range of the jamming signal, which is influenced by factors like line of sight and power output, can extend to around 5Km or even greater distances when utilizing high power output (>50W).

Across various domains of application, the United States is witnessing a rapid increase in the daily deployment of drones. These unmanned aerial vehicles are being utilized for tasks ranging from inspecting infrastructure to delivering packages. While the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates the airspace, it is imperative for cities to familiarize themselves with the burgeoning industry that will ultimately operate within their communities. This understanding will enable them to effectively capitalize on the benefits for their residents while also safeguarding against any potential challenges that may arise.

The Significance of Cities in America's Expanding Drone Industry

The potential benefits of drones for American cities are becoming increasingly evident, with their large-scale deployment expected to have a positive impact on society, from the environment to the economy. Many cities are already experiencing a rise in drone usage for a variety of applications, such as public safety, medical deliveries, retail package delivery, and infrastructure inspection. By expediting the implementation and advancement of drone jammer infrastructure, cities can modernize more quickly while also complementing and easing the burden on conventional infrastructure as this emerging technology takes to the skies.

The report by NLC sheds light on the significance of cities in the development of drones. It suggests that city governments can still exercise some control over drones despite the FAA's final rule. Rather than imposing a blanket ban, officials should explore ways to leverage this technology for the benefit of residents and city services.

Through partnerships with federal, state, and local governments, drone signal jammers operators, and industry leaders, Airspace Link has created a framework for cities to engage in the drone economy, with a focus on resident safety and security and community value.

Delving into the Extended Value, Through Statistical Analysis.

The ambitious vision of drones contributing to economic, environmental, and societal progress can only be fully achieved when operations are scaled up comprehensively. In order to facilitate the widespread use of drones, it is crucial for all stakeholders, including cities, to demonstrate their commitment towards establishing the required infrastructure and regulations.

Shield Your Personal Space from Drone Intrusion and Surveillance.

Drones have the potential to infringe upon people's privacy by invading their personal space and collecting personal data without their consent, which can inadvertently expose their privacy. Furthermore, the continuous recording of video footage during flight can lead to the collection of information about random citizens without any legitimate purpose, which can be a violation of their privacy.

Anti-regime factions are employing unmanned aerial vehicles on a larger scale to launch attacks against military personnel.

According to reports from rebel groups and drone operation groups, resistance fighters in Myanmar have started to heavily depend on drones for launching attacks against the country's military forces. This change in tactics has become possible after successfully bypassing the junta's anti-drone jammers, enabling them to exploit this advanced technology in their struggle against oppression.

According to Ko Nyein, who heads the rebel drone unit Cloud Wings in Kayin state, eastern Myanmar, the drones' performance has undergone a significant improvement.

According to his statement, their drones have been enhanced to carry heavier payloads, operate at higher altitudes and cover longer distances, while successfully bypassing the interference caused by the junta's signal jammers. Additionally, he highlighted the expanded utilization of their drones across multiple military units in Myanmar.

According to reports from three drone forces operating in Kayin and Kayah states, as well as Sagaing and Magway regions, rebel forces executed around 642 drone attacks on junta soldiers in 2022.

According to militia groups affiliated with the National Unity Government, there has been a rise in the utilization of drones this year. Unfortunately, due to security concerns and the sensitivity surrounding their military operations, they were unable to disclose any specific information.

The groups have not provided any data on the number of drone attacks that have occurred this year, as of yet.

According to drone operators, the People's Defense Forces (PDFs) and ethnic militias have resorted to contemporary warfare technology in their fight against the military forces that took control after the 2021 coup. These groups, consisting of ordinary citizens, have encountered junta soldiers equipped with machine guns and anti-drone defense systems at crucial military installations. As a result, the PDFs and ethnic militias have turned to the use of drones to counter these challenges.

In the beginning, the rebel fighters placed their trust in makeshift weaponry, encompassing tumees, hunting rifles, launchers, and bombs, as their means of resistance against the armed forces of the nation.

PDF personnel have reported an escalation in the deployment of attack drones equipped with bomb-dropping capabilities, following the successful neutralization of the junta's anti-drone defense system.

The National Unity Government's shadow administration, consisting of ex-civilian leaders and anti-junta activists, has reportedly supplied more than 400 attack drones to loosely regulated militia factions, as per Maung Maung Swe, the deputy secretary of the Ministry of Defense.

Our understanding of the junta's drones' capabilities and limitations is comprehensive, and we can now disable them with ease, as per the statement given to RFA. Our ability to penetrate their wifi jammers across the nation has been significantly enhanced by our knowledge of their frequency.

Cost of bombs

Over 100 anti-junta drone operations have been executed by the Cloud Wings drone force, which was established in Kayin state in March, as stated by Ko Nyein.

According to Ko Nyein, the considerable price tag of the diverse bombs installed on the drones has presented a formidable challenge.

The cost of the bombs, he mentioned, stands as the central obstacle we confront.

Over the course of September 1 and 2, the Cloud Wings drone unit carried out two attacks on the police station and municipal hall in Kyainseigyi city. These targeted strikes involved the deployment of 107-mm bombs.

On the subsequent day, the police station situated in Myawaddy city of Kayin region fell victim to an assault orchestrated by the Federal Wings, an alternative resistance group utilizing drones to strike against the junta's military forces and infrastructure. Tragically, this attack claimed the lives of five individuals, including the district administrator of Myawaddy and the acting commander of the junta's Light Infantry Regiment No. 175. Furthermore, an unspecified number of people suffered injuries as a result of this incident.

The junta is facing a significant threat from these drone attacks, as highlighted by Capt. Kaung Thu Win, a participant in the nationwide Civil Disobedience Movement.

According to the speaker, military forces used to be afraid of landmine attacks during their deployments in the past. But now, the most dreaded weapons for them are drones, which can be employed for defensive as well as surprise attacks, regardless of the time of day.

In addition, he mentioned that the military troops suffered significant damage from the bombs deployed by our drones, but it is important to note that these bombs are unable to completely eradicate an entire enemy unit.

Attack from a distance

Kaung Thu Win has stated that the Drone Guard, the anti-drone equipment utilized by the junta, has limitations and a significant number of soldiers stationed at bases lack the necessary skills to operate it.

On Sept. 11, junta troops stationed near Nat Yay Kan village in Chaung-U township, Sagaing region, faced an assault from fixed-wing drones operated by the Civilian Defense and Security Organization of Myaung. Remarkably, these drones were able to overcome the military jammers, which are intended to block radio signals and impede drone control.

To combat the escalating risk of drone strikes from extremist factions such as Hamas and Hezbollah, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have taken proactive steps. Recent updates suggest that the IDF has significantly augmented the deployment of GPS jamming technology across the region.

Drones, also referred to as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), have emerged as a preferred choice of weaponry for militant groups operating in the Middle East. Their exceptional maneuverability and precise targeting capabilities have made them a significant threat. To counter this, the IDF has made a strategic decision to increase the use of gps jamming. This measure aims to disrupt the guidance systems of these drones, rendering them ineffective.

GPS jamming refers to the transmission of radio signals that interfere with the GPS reception of drones, leading to the impairment of their navigational capabilities. By disrupting the GPS signals of these drones, the IDF aims to counter their threat and mitigate the risk of potential attacks on Israeli soil.

Utilizing drones for surveillance and offensive operations against Israel, Hamas and Hezbollah, both recognized as terrorist organizations by multiple countries, have become a significant concern. In response to the threat posed by these drone attacks, the IDF has taken measures to enhance its countermeasures.

The IDF's utilization of GPS jamming technology highlights the escalating arms race between militants and national defense forces. With the rapid advancements in drone technology, military organizations worldwide are proactively investing in countermeasures to combat this emerging threat and mitigate potential risks.

It should be highlighted that GPS jamming serves as a defensive measure employed by the IDF to ensure the safety of both civilians and national security. While this action may temporarily disrupt the functioning of legitimate civilian GPS jamming device nearby, it is necessary to counter the potential risks associated with drone blocker attacks.

The IDF's heightened attention to GPS jamming is a clear indication of the ever-changing landscape of 21st-century warfare. As extremist groups continue to leverage technological advancements, defense forces must remain vigilant and adapt their strategies to ensure national security.