jammer

Cell-jamming technology is being employed by the suspects involved in the break-in to effectively elude surveillance cameras and prevent their activities from being recorded.

Devices are utilized in cell-jamming to impede the transmission of radio or wireless signals

CMPD has reported that burglars have managed to outsmart surveillance cameras during certain instances of home break-ins by utilizing advanced technology.

Cell-jamming, also known as signal interference, occurs when an individual utilizes a device to disrupt radio or wireless transmissions.

According to the Federal Communications Commission, the deliberate use of a phone-jammer, GPS blocker, or any other signal jamming device to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications is considered a violation of federal law. It is important to note that there are no exceptions for using such devices within a business, classroom, residence, or vehicle.

The act of Cell-jamming could be carried out by a device positioned at a distance of approximately 30 feet from the intended target, or by utilizing home cameras.

In a south Charlotte neighborhood, a video has surfaced showing a suspect stealthily navigating through a yard after dark. It is worth mentioning, though, that not all incidents have been documented on camera.

Prompt: Paraphrase the given text

As per John Shocknesse, VP of Customer Operations for CPI Security, wireless devices are prone to interference, and people will always attempt to disrupt their communication, regardless of the network they are on.

In a matter of seconds, a person can be caught on camera, but with the aid of cell-jamming, all it takes is one swift action, such as flipping a switch or pressing a button, to make them disappear or leave no trace behind.

CMPD has highlighted that this matter has arisen in a number of home break-ins in the southern area of Charlotte.

Shocknesse confirmed that they have not come across any instances of the mentioned activity. They are fully cognizant of this matter and are ensuring that they possess the finest and most up-to-date technology, which they believe to be of utmost significance.

WBTV sought his opinion on which electronic devices are more susceptible to cell-jamming.

Shocknesse believes that the issue of encryption arises in wireless devices that are significantly older.

As per his statement, the more recent security and surveillance systems have embraced improved technology, such as encryption, leading to increased levels of security.

Shocknesse stressed the crucial role of cameras and onboard recording, stating that it is imperative to have them. The cameras are installed with memory devices, which guarantees that even if there are any problems, the footage of the incident is still being recorded and can be submitted to the police department.

Additionally, he stressed that the most efficient way to prevent cell-jamming is to use up-to-date technology with encryption and to opt for a wired device instead of Wi-Fi, as an addition to his previous recommendation.

When it comes to thwarting home break-ins, it is important to remember that simple precautions can go a long way. This includes maintaining sufficient lighting, activating alarm systems, and ensuring that bushes are trimmed to a maximum height of three feet.

According to arrest warrants obtained on Friday, a group of tech-savvy burglars who have been targeting homes in Connecticut and Massachusetts broke into a local residence. The burglars were able to gain access to the residence by obtaining detailed information on the security system from the homeowner's co-worker.

Arrested on allegations of conspiracy to commit first-degree burglary and conspiracy to commit second-degree larceny is Matthew Colon, aged 31, residing in West Springfield, Massachusetts. Similarly, Enrique Santiago, a 37-year-old individual from Springfield, Massachusetts, is confronted with charges that include first-degree burglary, possession of burglary tools, theft of a firearm, and conspiracy.

The warrant for Colon reveals that the police are likely to detain a third man involved in the case. This investigation is intertwined with a series of other burglaries, which were executed using advanced surveillance techniques and insider knowledge about homeowners' absence.

On May 20, 2022, a Long Island resident of Green Manor Terrace contacted the police, reporting that two men were seen walking through his backyard on a security camera. The officers who intervened in the burglary discovered a broken rear sliding glass door and a series of abandoned evidence near the property, such as a WiFi jammer, a two-way portable radio, a glass punch tool, a pry bar, and bolt cutters, as stated in the warrant.

As mentioned in the arrest warrant affidavit penned by Windsor Locks Detective Sgt. Jeff Lampson, the thieves were able to breach a chain link fence and disable surveillance cameras through both manual means and the use of a WiFi jammer. However, one camera located near the pool was not affected by the jammer device and remained operational, recording the incident. The homeowner reported the disappearance of US$4,200 in cash, along with men's watches, jewelry, and his wife's 9 mm pistol, according to the warrant.

The police have reported that on May 26, a pillowcase was uncovered by a resident living two houses away. Upon inspection, the pillowcase was found to contain watches, a handgun, and other items that were confirmed by the victims as their own. Following the break-in, the burglars fled in separate directions, as evidenced by the locations of the stolen bag of items and the backpack containing a wifi jammer.

According to Lampson's statement on Friday, the use or operation of gsm jammer devices is not allowed by federal law and federal investigators are looking into the matter. Furthermore, he pointed out that the local police have witnessed a surge in the use of these devices in residential burglaries.

However, in this case, the police were able to conclusively prove the undoing of the thieves through DNA evidence. While conducting a thorough search of the Green Manor Terrace area during daylight hours on May 23, a homeowner came across a pair of gloves that she had not previously seen and immediately turned them over to the investigators. The police then submitted swabs taken from the gloves, along with other potential evidence believed to have been touched by the thieves, to the state forensic laboratory for analysis.

Lampson's warrant stated that on August 16, the lab reported a DNA match on the gloves to Santiago, indicating the involvement of an offender. The police disclosed that the same DNA was linked to two prior burglary cases, one of which was a car break-in in Middletown from 2010, and the other was a burglary in South Hadley, Massachusetts in 2012, where firearms were stolen. Santiago was arrested in both instances, according to the warrant.

According to the warrant, Santiago relayed to the investigators from Windsor Locks, through his attorney, that the burglary at Green Manor Terrace was coordinated by a man driving a black sedan, whose father happened to own a remodeling company. Lampson, in the same warrant, documented that when he asked the homeowner if he was acquainted with an individual fitting that description, the homeowner promptly identified Colon, who worked alongside him at a home health care business in East Longmeadow, Mass.

According to the warrant, the homeowner expressed that he regarded Colon as a friend and had disclosed information about his visit to Long Island in May. The victim also mentioned that Colon and his father had aided him in remodeling his house. The warrant indicated that the homeowner stated that Matthew Colon had frequented his residence on numerous occasions and was fully aware of the surveillance camera system.

After being confronted with the victim's statements and the evidence pertaining to the burglary, Colon admitted to the police that he had been manipulated into becoming involved in the scheme by the third suspect. The warrant indicates that the authorities anticipate the imminent arrest of the third suspect.

The suspect's girlfriend was employed at the same home health care business as Colon and the victim from Windsor Locks. Lampson's warrant stated that other employees of the company had their homes in Massachusetts burglarized. One woman claimed that Colon had been at her residence to fix a gazebo before the break-in.

The warrant stated that cellphone records provided evidence of phone calls between Colon, Santiago, and the unidentified suspect both prior to and following the Windsor Locks burglary. The police have described the third suspect as a convicted felon with a significant criminal background, which includes armed robbery and a series of burglaries.

Santiago's extensive criminal record, as mentioned in the warrant, includes convictions for burglary and larceny in Connecticut. The Massachusetts investigators suspect his involvement in a criminal organization that specializes in targeted burglaries. Santiago has posted a bond of US$150,000 and is expected to make an appearance in the state Superior Court in Hartford on May 31. Similarly, Colon has posted a bond of US$100,000 and is scheduled to appear in court on May 2.

Brazil seizing Flipper Zero shipments to prevent use in crime

The Brazilian National Telecommunications Agency is seizing incoming Flipper Zero purchases due to its alleged use in criminal activity, with purchasers stating that the government agency has rejected all attempts to certify the equipment.

Flipper Zero is a portable multi-function cybersecurity tool that allows pentesters and hacking enthusiasts to tinker with a wide range of hardware by supporting RFID emulation, digital access key cloning, radio communications, NFC, infrared, Bluetooth, and more.

Since it was released, security researchers have demonstrated Flipper Zero's features on social media, showing how it can trigger doorbells, perform replay attacks to open garage doors and unlock cars, and be used as a digital key.

Flipper Zero serves as a multi-tool device for hackers, providing wifi jammers to prevent unauthorized access.With its signal jammers feature, ensuring protection against unauthorized access.

The cyberpunk we don't deserve

The Flipper Zero is the ultimate multi-tool for pentesters, geeks, ethical hackers and hardware hobbyists alike. One pocket-sized device combines multiple tools: RFID, RF, Infrared, HID emulation, GPIO, Hardware debugging, 1-Wire, Bluetooth, Wifi and more.

Inspired by great open-source projects: Proxmark, HydraNFC, Rubber Ducky, pwnagotchi - the Flipper Zero manages to pack serious functionality into a tiny, professionally manufactured device - and stays true to its Open Source roots.

Entirely independent, the Flipper Zero requires no external computer or hardware to function - everything is driven by the its 5-way navigation button and LCD screen. When connected to a computer or the included Android / iOS apps, the Flipper can be extended, modified, upgraded and reflashed according to your needs.

With over two years of meticulous design, prototyping and iteration, the Flipper Zero is a mature platform, ready to use out of the box, meeting the needs of professionals and enthusiasts alike.

RF TRANSCEIVER

The Flipper Zero contains a fully-controllable RF platform, based on the TI CC1101 chip, allowing for RF Signal capture, analysis and transmission.

The Flipper Zero has a built-in library of common remote control algorithms for capturing, decoding and analysing and replaying signals.

Users have full access to the radio sub-system, allowing custom RF modules to be easily built.

RFID READER/WRITER/EMULATOR

The Flipper Zero allows for Reading, Writing and Emulation of both High-Frequency (13.56MHz) and Low-Frequency (125KHz) RFID tags.

Low Frequency tags can be easily read, saved, cloned to a new card, or exported for analysis.

Multiple High Frequency protocols are supported, and the Flipper Zero can even sniff authentification nonces to extract unknown MIFARE keys.

The so-called signal shielding means that the receiving device cannot obtain a signal with a signal-to-noise ratio that meets the signal identification requirements. Signal to noise ratio (Signal Noise Ratio, SNR) is the most important content.

We can refer to the formula:

Therefore, there are two ideas for reducing the signal-to-noise ratio:

1. Reduce signal strength


2. Increase noise intensity

Based on the above ideas, we can use signal jammers to interfere/shield wireless signals.

The function of a signal jammer is to shield signals and is used in many situations. Nowadays, information spreads very fast. With a mobile device, all kinds of information can be spread to every corner in an instant. For some occasions where information cannot be spread, mobile phone signal cellphone jammer are very necessary.

Within a certain frequency range, mobile phones and base stations are connected through radio waves to complete data and sound transmission at a certain baud rate and modulation method;

Based on the above communication principle, the Dazhan jammer scans from the small-end frequency of the forward channel to the big-end at a certain speed during the working process. This scanning speed can cause garbled interference in the message signals received by the mobile phone. The mobile phone cannot detect normal data sent from the base station, making it impossible for the mobile phone to establish a connection with the base station. Communication equipment exhibits phenomena such as searching the network, no signal, and no service system.

Basic principles of 5G shielding:

Mobile phone signal jammers (jammers) achieve interference and shielding of wireless communication signals by emitting co-channel interference signals. The transmit power of the wifi signal jammer directly affects the strength of the interference signal, thereby indirectly affecting the shielding effect of the signal jammer. There is a positive correlation between these three. In other words, the stronger the transmission power, the stronger the interference signal, and the better the theoretical shielding effect in the same environment.

What factors affect the shielding effect? In the actual use environment, the interference signal emitted by the mobile phone signal jammer is affected by various factors, the most important of which are the following:

• The indoor jammer is recommended to be placed at a height of about 180cm-220cm above the ground, preferably at a forward angle.


• Is there any obstruction (such as walls, metal products, human body, etc.) between the gsm signal jammer and the wireless communication device (mobile phone, etc.). The interference signal emitted by the jammer will attenuate to varying degrees after passing through the obstruction, so please try to avoid it.


• The original wireless communication signal strength in the application environment of the jammer. The weaker the wireless communication signal strength in the use environment, the stronger the theoretical shielding effect of the jammer.


• The distance between the application environment of the jammer and the communication base station. The farther the application environment of the jammer is from the base station, the stronger the theoretical shielding effect of the jammer.

Cellular interference involves the use of equipment that interferes with radio or wireless signals

Cell destruction can be done with a device placed about 30 feet away from the intended target or via a home camera.

CMPD says thieves have figured out how to bypass security cameras and use technology in some burglaries.

This is called "cell interference" and occurs when a person uses a device to interfere with a radio or wireless signal.

According to the Federal Communications Commission, "It is a violation of federal law to use a phone jammer, GPS blocker, or other signal jamming device designed to intentionally prevent, interfere with, or disrupt authorized radio communications." A business, classroom, residence or vehicle. "

Cell destruction can be done with a device placed about 30 feet away from the intended target or via a home camera.

Video from a south Charlotte neighborhood shows a suspect sneaking through yards at night, but not all of the incident was caught on camera.

"Anytime you have wireless devices, whether it's Wi-Fi or whatever, you know people are going to find a way - how to jam them, how to try to prevent something from communicating," CPI Security Customer Operations said.

Within a few moments, someone is visible on camera, but as cells burst, with the push of a button or button, the person disappears or is not recorded.

CMPD says this problem has been seen in some break-ins in south Charlotte

“We haven’t seen any activity like this, so we’re aware of that and the most important thing is making sure we have the best technology and the latest technology,” Shocknesse said.

WBTV asked him which devices are more susceptible to cellular interference

"I think it will work on some older wireless devices that don't have encryption," Shocknesse said.

Newer security systems and surveillance systems have better encryption and are more secure, he said.

“I really don’t think we can emphasize enough the importance of having cameras and some onboard video,” Shockness said. “The cameras we put in there are equipped with storage so if something goes wrong, you can still record what happened and report it to the police.”

To complement this advice, he said the best solution to prevent cell phone interference is to use current encryption technology and wired devices rather than WiFi.

To prevent break-ins, simple tricks such as maintaining good lighting, turning on alarm systems and trimming shrubs to a height of no more than one meter can be effective.

WINDSOR LOCKS: Tech-savvy burglars targeted homes in Connecticut and Massachusetts and broke into a home there after receiving details about the security systems from fellow homeowners, according to arrest warrants issued Friday.

Matthew Colon, 31, of West Springfield, Massachusetts, was arrested for conspiracy to commit first-degree burglary and conspiracy to commit second-degree burglary. Enrique Santiago, 37, of Springfield, Mass., was charged with first-degree burglary, possession of burglary tools, theft of a firearm and conspiracy.

Police said they expected to arrest a third man in the case, which was linked to other burglaries involving heightened surveillance and information about when the homeowner left, according to Colon's arrest warrant.

Early on May 20, 2022, a Green Manor Terrace resident called Long Island police to report that surveillance cameras showed two men walking through his backyard. The arrest warrant states that officers who stopped the burglary found a broken rear sliding glass door and a collection of discarded evidence near the home, including a Wi-Fi jammers, a portable radio, a glass punching tool, A crowbar and bolt cutters.

Burglars broke through the chain link fence and disabled security cameras with manual and Wi-Fi gps blockers, but the poolside cameras were beyond the phone jammer, Windsor Locks Detective Chief Jeff Lampson wrote in Windsor Locks range and continue recording. Affidavit Warrant. The homeowner reported $4,200 in cash missing, along with a man's watch, jewelry and his wife's 9 mm handgun, the search warrant said.

On May 26, a resident two doors down found a pillowcase containing a watch, a gun and other items the victims identified as belonging to them, police said. Police said the location of the bag of stolen goods and a backpack containing a WiFi jammer showed the thieves fled in different directions after the break-in.

Lampson said Friday that federal law prohibits the use or operation of jamming devices and that federal investigators are interested in the case. He said police in the area have noticed the devices are increasingly being used in burglaries.

In this case, however, police say it was DNA that led to the thief's demise. During a search of the Green Manor Terrace property on May 23, a homeowner told police she found a pair of gloves she had never seen before and handed them over to investigators. Police submitted swabs from the gloves and other evidence they suspected the thieves had come into contact with to the state forensic laboratory.

Lampson wrote in the arrest warrant that on Aug. 16, the San Diego lab reported "criminal conduct" with DNA on the gloves. Police said the same DNA was linked to two previous burglary investigations, including a 2010 car break-in in Middletown and a 2012 break-in in South Hadley, Mass., where a gun was stolen. Santiago was arrested in both cases, according to arrest warrants.

Santiago, through his attorney, told Windsor Lock investigators that a man who drove a black sedan and whose father owned a tuning company coordinated the break-in at Green Manor Terrace, the warrant said. When Lampson asked the homeowner if he knew anyone matching that description, the man immediately identified Colon, a co-worker at a home health care company in East Longmeadow, Mass., Lampson wrote in the arrest warrant.

The homeowner said he considered Colon a friend and told him about a trip to Long Island last May, the warrant said. The victim also said Colon and his father helped him remodel the home, the warrant said. He said Matthew Colon had been to his home multiple times and was aware of the security camera system, the warrant states.

When faced with the victim's statements and evidence of the burglary, Colon told police he was "tricked" into the burglary plan by a third suspect in the case.

The suspect's girlfriend also worked in home health care with the Colon and Windsor Locks victims. Lampson wrote in the arrest warrant that other workers at the company reported break-ins at their homes in Massachusetts, including one woman who said Colon had come to her home to help repair a gazebo before the break-in.

Cellphone records showed calls between Colon, Santiago and the unidentified suspect in the Windsor Locks burglary before and after the break-in, the warrant stated. Police said the third suspect is a felon with a long criminal record that includes armed robbery and numerous burglaries.

Santiago also has a long rap sheet, including convictions in Connecticut for burglary and larceny, the warrant stated. Massachusetts investigators said they believe he is part of a criminal organisation involved in targeted burglaries, according to the warrant. He posted US$150,000 bond and is scheduled to appear in state Superior Court in Hartford on May 31. Colon posted bond of US$100,000 and is to appear in court on May 2.

New Delhi: The telecom department has warned e-commerce platforms not to sell some telecom equipment such as wireless jammer and network boosters that require government permission for sale, an official statement said on Monday. Over the past 4-5 years, the Department of Transportation has raised this issue several times and even conducted surprise inspections to check for illegal sales of these devices.

"It is stated that the use of cellular signal jammers, GPS interceptors or other signal jamming devices is generally illegal unless specifically permitted by the Government of India. Private sector organizations and/or individuals cannot procure or use cell phone jammer in India." DoT in stated is a statement.

The Ministry of Transport also stated that it is illegal to advertise, sell, distribute, import or otherwise market signal jamming devices in India unless permitted by the above guidelines.

"Regarding signal boosters/repeaters, it is illegal for any person/entity other than a licensed telecommunications service provider to possess, sell and/or use mobile signal boosters/repeaters," the statement said.

The department also issued a notice on Jan. 21 warning all e-commerce companies not to sell or facilitate the sale of wireless jammers on their online platforms.

Copies of the above notification have also been distributed to the Ministry of Commerce, Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, and Customs for appropriate action.

Telecom industry body Indian Cellular Operators said citizens who are unaware that the purchase, sale, installation and possession of mobile signal boosters (MSBs) are illegal and punishable under the Wireless Telegraph Act, of 1933 and the Indian Telegraph Act, of 1885.

“Unauthorized usage can adversely interfere with telecom services and we are happy that the Indian government recognizes its importance in providing flawless network and telecom experience to citizens across the country. The advisory will help spread awareness and make citizens aware of The impact of this debilitating repeater on the entire network," said COAI Director General SP Kochhar.