jammer

The use of signal blockers to ensure security at public events is a complex issue and may involve a range of legal, ethical and technical considerations. Signal blockers are mainly used to block or interfere with wireless communication signals, but their use needs to be carefully considered to avoid interference with legitimate communications and possible adverse consequences. If necessary, the use of signal jammer should be carried out by trained security experts, while ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations wifi jammer.

Here are some possible scenarios to consider:

Terrorist attack prevention: In some cases, signal blockers may be used to prevent terrorists from using remote detonating devices, such as those triggered by cell phone signals. In this case, signal blockers may be deployed around public events to block remote trigger signals for explosive devices.

Communication Management: In some activities, wireless communication may need to be restricted or managed to ensure the security of the activity. For example, at high-security events, an individual's wireless communication devices may be restricted to prevent them from being used to transmit sensitive information or as part of a detonating device.

Electronic boundary Settings: Signal blockers can be used to create electronic boundaries that limit the use of wireless communication devices within a specific area. This can be used to restrict unauthorized persons from entering or leaving an area, thereby enhancing the security of the event.

However, it is important to stress that the use of signal blockers can have a negative impact on public communications, including emergency communications, emergency services and the general public. Therefore, when using a signal shield, it is necessary to carefully consider its possible adverse consequences, and take appropriate measures to minimize these effects. It is best to use a signal blocker under the guidance of a professional safety expert and in compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.

WiFi jammers have gained significant popularity in the contemporary market in recent times. This cutting-edge equipment plays a crucial role in enhancing your security level and mitigating the potential risks of unauthorized access to personal data. Utilizing a wifi jammer at home can prove to be a valuable asset. However, it is important to acknowledge the existence of certain obstacles that may arise. Nevertheless, this equipment can be easily configured for daily usage, safeguarding sensitive information from tampering and preventing the theft of valuable data.

The emergence of an impediment presents a valuable chance to mitigate the vulnerabilities associated with unauthorized access to personal information. Blockers generate distinctive signals at the intended frequency, akin to WiFi devices. Consequently, it effectively obstructs any movement within a specified range.

Tracking devices become entirely ineffective when faced with these obstacles. Generally, organizations and major corporations utilize such obstructive tools to safeguard their confidential data from being exposed to competitors. WiFi signal jammers are dependable and well-established devices that offer security and reliability, making them valuable for any security-conscious individual.

What does an internet jammer do?

WiFi technology is now widely utilized for data transfer in various locations. Public wireless access points have become popular, but they come with numerous vulnerabilities. One major concern is the ease with which unauthorized individuals can access sensitive information on your device. To mitigate this risk, it is advisable to employ a dedicated WiFi scrambler.

WiFi technology functions within the 2.4 GHz frequency band. Numerous contemporary devices operate within this range, which helps in minimizing the system's expenses but also renders it more susceptible to external threats. Sophisticated jammers have the capability to operate across multiple frequency ranges, effectively blocking several signals concurrently.

A WiFi-blocking device is specifically engineered to intercept signals within a designated range. This type of device effectively disrupts wireless signals within its operational distance. For civilian use, these devices can effectively block signals up to a maximum distance of twenty meters. On the other hand, advanced military-grade models possess superior capabilities, capable of blocking calls several hundred meters away, thereby safeguarding sensitive information from potential compromise.

Can a jammer block WiFi?

Modern jammers are often used to block WiFi signals. Among the main features of the equipment, you should pay attention to the following:

Signal blockers ensure the safeguarding of personal data while upholding privacy on a wireless network.

The utilization of numerous WiFi devices enables the tracking of your location, thus the implementation of a blocker can effectively mitigate the potential risk of being detected.

Additionally, by utilizing different tracking devices, monitoring your online status becomes a simple task. Enhancing security is made possible by employing a wireless jammer to greatly minimize potential risks.

Numerous prominent corporations prioritize the safety of both their organization and their workforce. Hence, it is advisable to mitigate potential network vulnerabilities by utilizing specialized equipment. One option is to opt for compact and portable devices that occupy minimal space while offering a substantial range of influence to guarantee optimal equipment functionality.

The device can also be utilized within the confines of your home. For instance, if your children tend to dedicate a significant amount of time to playing games or watching cartoons instead of completing their homework, you have the option to obstruct wireless signals, enabling them to concentrate on their studies. It is crucial to select top-notch equipment for your household without overspending on the purchase.

Purchasing a jammer serves as the most effective safeguard against hacker attacks and intruder threats. Various types of devices are utilized in our daily lives, such as portable and stationary ones. Despite differences in size and performance, these devices share a common principle of processing incoming information, thereby enhancing their accessibility and functionality for all individuals.

Are WiFi blockers a thing?

WiFi jammers are contemporary devices that serve various purposes. These advanced tools aid in enhancing security measures and safeguarding the privacy of sensitive information. Additionally, there are versatile gadgets available that possess the capability to simultaneously disrupt multiple signal types, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the equipment.

Authorities with the Los Angeles Police Department are warning residents in Los Angeles’ Wilshire-area neighborhoods of a series of burglaries involving wifi jamming technology that can disarm surveillance cameras and alarms using a wireless signal.

According to police, the burglaries typically involve three to four suspects who enter homes through a second story balcony.

Once inside, the thieves target primary bedrooms in search of high-end jewelry, purses, U.S. currency and other valuables.

Man found dead in pond of Southern California apartment complex

“On many occasions, these suspects will have a getaway vehicle and driver to act as a look out,” authorities said in a community alert.

To deter these types of burglaries, authorities provided the following tips:

• Ensure your electrical circuit boxes are secured with a padlock to make it harder for thieves to tamper with alarm systems


• Never tell Uber, Lyft or taxi drivers or post on social media that you will be on vacation or away from home


• Stay alert for suspicious vehicles with temporary or dealer plates, as well as rental vehicles


• Share your cellphone number with trusted neighbors and ask them to clear your mail and keep an eye on your residence if you plan to be away


• Place cameras around the home and ensure that the alarm DVR is secure and cannot be tampered with


• Consider moving to an alarm system that is hard wired rather than running on a wireless signal


• Provide extra security such as a pole to sliding glass doors to eliminate easy opening


• Place tracking devices, such as Apple AirTags, on valuable items like jewelry boxes, purses or vehicles


• See what shrubbery or trees can be trimmed or cut to keep your residence highly visible


• Install proper lighting and security signage and always leave light on in your home, especially while away

Anyone with information on any of these crimes is encouraged to contact LAPD’s Wilshire Burglary Detectives at Wilshireburglary@lapd.online. Those wishing to remain anonymous can contact L.A. Regional Crime Stoppers at 800-222-8477 or online at L.A. Crime Stoppers.

How to stop wifi jammer attacks on home security systems

The internet was abuzz with a viral news story from Queens, New York, which showcased a burglar effortlessly sliding across the floor while holding an enigmatic device. According to reports, this device was suspected to be a wifi jammer, strategically employed by the intruder to disable the home's wifi network and render the alarm system inoperable, allowing him to carry out his activities undetected.

Is this even possible? Yes, yes it is.

So what is a wifi jammer?

In essence, these jamming devices generate a frequency that disrupts the functioning of 3G, 4G, 5G, cordless, and wifi networks. Essentially, they affect all of these networks.

The presence of excessive noise disrupts the functioning of devices that rely on those frequencies for their normal operation. This interference extends to emergency networks used by first responders, which is the reason why the use of such devices is deemed illegal. However, these unauthorized devices are produced and traded on the black market, and individuals can potentially create their own. It is strongly recommended not to search for instructions online, as it may lead to being monitored by authorities.

Through the generation of disruptive noise, a signal blocker device disrupts the frequencies utilized by our devices, preventing their proper functioning. This interference extends beyond the intended targets, affecting a significant number of devices.

With this new information in mind, do you foresee any issues with your phones, alarm sensors, alarm base station, smart locks, and wifi cameras? It is a potential risk.

You might be wondering about this: "Andy, my alarm system has a cellular backup for when the wifi goes down. Will it still be functional?" Sadly, the answer is no. The sensors will be unable to establish communication with the base station due to the interference caused by these jammers. It is crucial to keep in mind that these jammers not only disrupt wifi signals but also block mobile spectrums, rendering your base station incapable of making calls over wifi or a cellular network.

How To Stop Wifi Jammer and Deauth Attacks

With knowledge about the nature and outcomes of these attacks, what steps should we take to defend against them? Have you remembered my caution about refraining from showcasing the alarm company branded sign in your yard?

This serves as an explanation as to why it is crucial to keep your home security methods confidential to avoid being targeted by criminals who could exploit your defenses. It is quite simple to identify companies that utilize the 2.4 GHz band.

When selecting new smart home products, ensure they are dual-band or compatible with the 5 gigahertz frequency. I've read about the potential benefits of WPA3 security in preventing these attacks, but as a novice, I cannot confirm its effectiveness. Regrettably, wireless alarm systems are still at risk of jammer attacks.

Select the old-fashioned route by installing a fully wired home alarm system that is connected to a landline. If there are no wireless components, then you should have no issues.

Local storage is a key feature in cameras provided by companies like Ring. This feature allows the cameras to continue recording clips even if there is a wifi outage or cloud storage is not accessible. While you may not receive notifications during such circumstances, you can still access the footage by simply checking the SD card inserted in the camera itself.

To ensure the reliability of your home security, it is recommended to consider adding a cost-effective local storage camera to your existing wifi camera system. By doing so, you can mitigate the risk of losing all footage in the event of a jammer or deauth attack. However, it is crucial to note that if the attackers identify the camera, they may try to vandalize it and take it along.

Wi-Fi jammers: The tool of choice for criminals

The use of Wi-Fi jammers in burglaries is on the rise, indicating a growing trend among burglars. To counteract this, the police have taken proactive measures by securing arrest warrants to thoroughly investigate and apprehend those involved.Exploiting vulnerabilities present in wireless networks, thieves and criminal organizations are capitalizing on these weaknesses, while law enforcement agencies are actively pursuing these criminals by means of arrest warrants. By employing signal jammers, these perpetrators can effectively disable security systems and surveillance cameras, enabling them to clandestinely infiltrate homes without raising any red flags for the police.

Exploit wireless network vulnerabilities

Due to the extensive adoption of wireless networks in residential settings, perpetrators and criminal syndicates have discovered an alternative method to perpetrate illegal actions without legal permission. Exploiting the dependence of numerous home security systems and cameras on Wi-Fi connections for communication and surveillance, thieves take advantage of this vulnerability.This legal loophole was cleverly employed by the crew to evade the requirement of a search warrant. By utilizing Wi-Fi jammers, thieves can effectively disrupt these connections, rendering security measures useless without proper authorization.

Disable security systems and cameras

The presence of Wi-Fi interference raises apprehension as it allows thieves to tamper with the signals that security systems and cameras heavily depend on. By disabling these devices, criminals can carry out their illicit actions without the worry of being recorded or triggering any alarms.

By employing this technique, they gain a significant upper hand as they can enter the residence without alerting anyone or leaving any incriminating evidence, even in the absence of a search warrant. Moreover, it affords them a greater window of opportunity to act before authorities or homeowners become aware of the intrusion, without requiring a warrant.

The mechanism of Wi-Fi interference

Jamming wireless signal

Wi-Fi interference serves as a tactic employed by criminals to hinder or obstruct wireless signals, effectively preventing communication between devices connected to a Wi-Fi network. The radio frequencies emitted by these jammers can disrupt the seamless operation of the Wi-Fi network, resulting in its unreliability or complete inability to function.

Radio frequency interference

The functioning of jammers involves the transmission of radio signals on the same frequency band utilized by Wi-Fi networks. This interference hampers the smooth transmission and reception of data packets, thereby rendering it impossible for legitimate users to gain access to the network. Consequently, individuals attempting to connect to the targeted network will encounter severe connectivity problems or may find it completely unattainable.

Wi-Fi networks can be subjected to specific frequency bands through the use of different types of jammers. For instance, certain jammers are designed to operate on the 2.4 GHz band, which is commonly utilized by older Wi-Fi standards like 802.11b/g/n. On the other hand, there are jammers that can specifically target the 5 GHz band used by newer standards such as 802.11ac/ax.

By concentrating on specific frequency bands, criminals possess the ability to selectively disrupt devices or networks with certain capabilities and vulnerabilities. This strategic approach empowers them to exploit security system weaknesses, ultimately gaining unauthorized access to homes or businesses.

The invasion of organized crews and high-end homes

The tactics employed by organized crime syndicates to gain unauthorized access to homes are growing more sophisticated, with the utilization of Wi-Fi jammers for upscale break-ins. These criminal networks specifically set their sights on high-end residences boasting advanced security systems, deeming them as optimal targets to engage in illicit pursuits.

Through the utilization of Wi-Fi jammers, thieves can effectively evade alarm systems and surveillance cameras that would typically obstruct or capture their actions. This technology enables them to operate covertly, providing them with a substantial advantage over homeowners who depend on these security measures to ensure their safety.

These well-organized operatives employ a methodical approach when selecting their targets, often investing considerable time in conducting thorough research and surveillance beforehand. Their primary objective is to identify residences with valuable assets, such as precious jewelry or valuable artwork, to ensure that the potential rewards outweigh the inherent risks. Once a target has been chosen, they meticulously plan every detail to ensure a successful break-in.

There are situations where these wrongdoers may go to the extent of impersonating service personnel or delivery personnel to gain entry into a property. By mingling with authentic professionals, they can seamlessly penetrate a heavily guarded residence without raising any red flags.

It is imperative for homeowners to acknowledge this growing menace and take appropriate actions to ensure their safety and protect their property. Going beyond traditional alert systems, investing in additional layers of security can act as a deterrent to these organized criminals. For instance, the installation of motion sensor lights around the house or the use of smart locks that require biometric authentication can provide an extra level of protection against these resourceful wrongdoers.

Homeowners must prioritize staying well-informed about the latest techniques employed by criminals and maintaining a vigilant mindset to ensure the safety of their homes. By staying ahead of the game and implementing comprehensive security measures, homeowners can greatly diminish the likelihood of falling prey to these organized wrongdoers.

The proliferation of FPV drones has brought a flood of cheap wireless video tech. After flying and crashing a cheap FPV drone for a bit, [GreatScott] decided to try his hand at building his own video transmitter, which turned out to be a lot harder than expected.

While digital technology has caught up to the FPV world, a lot of systems still use analog video, especially for drone racing. The video quality isn’t great, but it has the advantage of very low latency. The technology is very similar to the old analog TV broadcasts, but mainly uses the 5.8 GHz license-free bands. It is essentially analog video signal, frequency modulated onto a 5.8 GHz carrier signal transmitted through an appropriately sized antenna.

After a brief failed experiment with a simple circuit built from discrete components, [GreatScott] turned his attention to voltage-controlled oscillators (VCO). He bought a couple of 5.8 GHz VCOs from Aliexpress, and created and used a simple opamp circuit to boost the FPV camera video signal to the required input level for the VCO. This failed to produce any identifiable image on his video receiver goggles. In an attempt to confirm that the VCOs produced the desired frequency, he ordered a similar 2.4 GHz VCOs and built a short range (20 cm) WiFi signal jammers. With a signal generator to create a simple input signal, and confirmed that it interfered with his laptop’s WiFi connection.

After more experimentation with other VCOs, the closest [GreatScott] came to success was a barely identifiable image transmitted using a Maxim 2.4 GHz VCO.

Building RF circuits that interfere with the legitimate signal around you, or broadcasting out of band, is generally not a great idea, and could earn you an unpleasant visit from the authorities.

One thing that has always peeved me off is when people are driving around staring at their phones. And then they get mad at me for smashing my horn when they almost hit me or someone else. Then they go right back to staring at their phone again… so i smash my horn again.

But the thought has crossed my mind more than once of being able to smash a button and silently disconnect their phones rather than having my life and property put in peril. Makes me smile, but I would get in more legal trouble than they would for smashing into someone with their vehicle “on accident” when in fact their neglect and inability to focus on operating a machine is the real fault. In my experience, i have been in several accidents due to neglectful drivers and others not following proper use of the road, they get no legal penalty and I end up having to pay the cost due to the fact that insurance is a scam that never pays out without a more expensive lawyer. But then again for those people who are responsible, jamming would likely have them pick up their phone to look at it when their hands free call or podcast or music stops, potentially causing more havock than a single irresponsible driver.

Only tangentially related, but makes me think about every time someone wrecked my car or almost wrecked my car anytime i read about frequency interuption/jamming.

An updated warning has been issued for those who employ wireless security cameras, such as "Ring," as a means of home protection.

Despite owning a Ring camera, a woman from Detroit was unable to capture the theft of her car from the front of her house. An expert in the area suggests that this is indicative of the growing technological expertise among criminals.

In a recent incident, the woman claimed that her car was stolen from her driveway. Upon examining the footage from her Ring camera, she noticed a notable absence of recorded hours.

In the opinion of Chris Burns, the owner of Techie Gurus, security cameras that utilize WiFi for recording are more focused on providing convenience rather than ensuring robust security. This is because WiFi signals can be easily disrupted, thereby preventing the camera from effectively capturing footage of individuals near your residence. Unfortunately, criminals have become aware of this vulnerability.

According to Burns, it is a misconception to view wireless as a reliable security measure. He highlighted the fact that wireless signals can be easily wifi jammer or blocked.

This gadget can be utilized by the wrongdoers as a WiFi jamming device or a deauther, with a compact design resembling that of an Apple Watch.

By standing in close proximity, a deauther can overpower a WiFi system, compelling the WiFi camera to cease its recording. This accessory is available at a relatively affordable price, typically ranging from $10 to $50. On the other hand, a jammer comes at a significantly higher cost, with prices ranging from $150 to $1,000.

The use of signal jammer, which are also highly illegal, presents a greater difficulty in locating them. However, a jammer with significant power can effortlessly disable WiFi security cameras on an entire street with a single button press.

In a statement, a spokesperson from Ring acknowledged that the performance of Ring devices can be impacted by WiFi signal interference, similar to other wifi-enabled devices. To resolve any connectivity issues, customers are urged to get in touch with Ring Customer Support.

How can customers protect themselves?

To achieve utmost security, Burns stressed the importance of a hard-wired connection, preferably through an ethernet cable or a similar medium.

The problem, although known to Ring, is considered to be infrequent, as stated by their spokesperson.

Burns pointed out that with the decreasing cost of technology, the demand for jammers is likely to grow, emphasizing the significance of keeping people fully aware and informed.

A WiFi and bluetooth jammer Can Prevent Data Theft

It is important to understand that WiFi is available in 2 frequencies, 2.4GHz and 5GHz. While 2.4GHz is by far the most commonly used, some newer routers do include 5GHz.

Bluetooth is within the 2.4GHz band, so any WiFi jammer that covers 2.4GHz is also going to block Bluetooth.

The next important consideration is the size of the coverage area needed for your application. We offer units such as which covers both 2.4GHz and 5GHz to approximately 15 meters, the popular spy camera jammer which covers 2.4GHz WiFi only to approximately 20 meters, or the extremely powerful which covers both, up to 250 meters.

There are some variations in the coverage area depending upon local signal strength, physical environment, etc. Where the signal is weaker, the coverage is greater, and vice versa.

How Far Should WiFi Reach?

The range of the WiFi signal can be influenced by factors such as the frequency range, signal strength, and the presence of walls or obstacles that may obstruct the signal between your jamming device and the router.

In terms of device coverage, the 2.4 GHz frequency band provides superior results, albeit at a slower speed. Comparatively, the 5 GHz frequency band offers higher speeds but has a more limited range, which can enhance your network's performance.

A standard WiFi router generally provides coverage within a range of about 100 feet indoors and up to 300 feet outdoors in open areas. Nevertheless, the range can be significantly affected by interference caused by other devices or materials.

Signal Disturbances and Interference

Through the utilization of a frequency range (2.4GHz or 5GHz) that travels through the air, the WiFi signal establishes a seamless connection between your devices and the internet. It is essential to consider newer equipment that supports the 5 GHz frequency band as signals in this band have a shorter range, minimizing the possibility of interference from neighboring networks in contrast to older equipment operating on the 2.4 GHz band.

Metal

Metal is the primary culprit when it comes to weakening your WiFi signal. Its excellent electrical conductivity allows it to reflect WiFi signals, resulting in buffering during streaming or videoconferencing, lagging during gaming, and frustratingly slow loading times.

Walls (Concrete & Brick)

Various factors, including the type of wall material and its thickness, play a role in determining the extent to which WiFi signals can be blocked by walls.

The ability of WiFi signals to penetrate walls can be impeded by concrete and brick materials. In particular, concrete walls pose a greater challenge as their higher density and thicker mass make them more effective at blocking WiFi signals compared to brick walls.

Windows, Glass & Mirrors

It’s generally not recommended to place your router next to a window or a mirror, either. WiFi signals can’t pass through windows, glass, and mirrors because these materials contain a thin layer of metal that reflects the radio waves back instead of allowing them to pass through.

Cell-jamming technology is being employed by the suspects involved in the break-in to effectively elude surveillance cameras and prevent their activities from being recorded.

Devices are utilized in cell-jamming to impede the transmission of radio or wireless signals

CMPD has reported that burglars have managed to outsmart surveillance cameras during certain instances of home break-ins by utilizing advanced technology.

Cell-jamming, also known as signal interference, occurs when an individual utilizes a device to disrupt radio or wireless transmissions.

According to the Federal Communications Commission, the deliberate use of a phone-jammer, GPS blocker, or any other signal jamming device to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications is considered a violation of federal law. It is important to note that there are no exceptions for using such devices within a business, classroom, residence, or vehicle.

The act of Cell-jamming could be carried out by a device positioned at a distance of approximately 30 feet from the intended target, or by utilizing home cameras.

In a south Charlotte neighborhood, a video has surfaced showing a suspect stealthily navigating through a yard after dark. It is worth mentioning, though, that not all incidents have been documented on camera.

Prompt: Paraphrase the given text

As per John Shocknesse, VP of Customer Operations for CPI Security, wireless devices are prone to interference, and people will always attempt to disrupt their communication, regardless of the network they are on.

In a matter of seconds, a person can be caught on camera, but with the aid of cell-jamming, all it takes is one swift action, such as flipping a switch or pressing a button, to make them disappear or leave no trace behind.

CMPD has highlighted that this matter has arisen in a number of home break-ins in the southern area of Charlotte.

Shocknesse confirmed that they have not come across any instances of the mentioned activity. They are fully cognizant of this matter and are ensuring that they possess the finest and most up-to-date technology, which they believe to be of utmost significance.

WBTV sought his opinion on which electronic devices are more susceptible to cell-jamming.

Shocknesse believes that the issue of encryption arises in wireless devices that are significantly older.

As per his statement, the more recent security and surveillance systems have embraced improved technology, such as encryption, leading to increased levels of security.

Shocknesse stressed the crucial role of cameras and onboard recording, stating that it is imperative to have them. The cameras are installed with memory devices, which guarantees that even if there are any problems, the footage of the incident is still being recorded and can be submitted to the police department.

Additionally, he stressed that the most efficient way to prevent cell-jamming is to use up-to-date technology with encryption and to opt for a wired device instead of Wi-Fi, as an addition to his previous recommendation.

When it comes to thwarting home break-ins, it is important to remember that simple precautions can go a long way. This includes maintaining sufficient lighting, activating alarm systems, and ensuring that bushes are trimmed to a maximum height of three feet.

According to arrest warrants obtained on Friday, a group of tech-savvy burglars who have been targeting homes in Connecticut and Massachusetts broke into a local residence. The burglars were able to gain access to the residence by obtaining detailed information on the security system from the homeowner's co-worker.

Arrested on allegations of conspiracy to commit first-degree burglary and conspiracy to commit second-degree larceny is Matthew Colon, aged 31, residing in West Springfield, Massachusetts. Similarly, Enrique Santiago, a 37-year-old individual from Springfield, Massachusetts, is confronted with charges that include first-degree burglary, possession of burglary tools, theft of a firearm, and conspiracy.

The warrant for Colon reveals that the police are likely to detain a third man involved in the case. This investigation is intertwined with a series of other burglaries, which were executed using advanced surveillance techniques and insider knowledge about homeowners' absence.

On May 20, 2022, a Long Island resident of Green Manor Terrace contacted the police, reporting that two men were seen walking through his backyard on a security camera. The officers who intervened in the burglary discovered a broken rear sliding glass door and a series of abandoned evidence near the property, such as a WiFi jammer, a two-way portable radio, a glass punch tool, a pry bar, and bolt cutters, as stated in the warrant.

As mentioned in the arrest warrant affidavit penned by Windsor Locks Detective Sgt. Jeff Lampson, the thieves were able to breach a chain link fence and disable surveillance cameras through both manual means and the use of a WiFi jammer. However, one camera located near the pool was not affected by the jammer device and remained operational, recording the incident. The homeowner reported the disappearance of US$4,200 in cash, along with men's watches, jewelry, and his wife's 9 mm pistol, according to the warrant.

The police have reported that on May 26, a pillowcase was uncovered by a resident living two houses away. Upon inspection, the pillowcase was found to contain watches, a handgun, and other items that were confirmed by the victims as their own. Following the break-in, the burglars fled in separate directions, as evidenced by the locations of the stolen bag of items and the backpack containing a wifi jammer.

According to Lampson's statement on Friday, the use or operation of gsm jammer devices is not allowed by federal law and federal investigators are looking into the matter. Furthermore, he pointed out that the local police have witnessed a surge in the use of these devices in residential burglaries.

However, in this case, the police were able to conclusively prove the undoing of the thieves through DNA evidence. While conducting a thorough search of the Green Manor Terrace area during daylight hours on May 23, a homeowner came across a pair of gloves that she had not previously seen and immediately turned them over to the investigators. The police then submitted swabs taken from the gloves, along with other potential evidence believed to have been touched by the thieves, to the state forensic laboratory for analysis.

Lampson's warrant stated that on August 16, the lab reported a DNA match on the gloves to Santiago, indicating the involvement of an offender. The police disclosed that the same DNA was linked to two prior burglary cases, one of which was a car break-in in Middletown from 2010, and the other was a burglary in South Hadley, Massachusetts in 2012, where firearms were stolen. Santiago was arrested in both instances, according to the warrant.

According to the warrant, Santiago relayed to the investigators from Windsor Locks, through his attorney, that the burglary at Green Manor Terrace was coordinated by a man driving a black sedan, whose father happened to own a remodeling company. Lampson, in the same warrant, documented that when he asked the homeowner if he was acquainted with an individual fitting that description, the homeowner promptly identified Colon, who worked alongside him at a home health care business in East Longmeadow, Mass.

According to the warrant, the homeowner expressed that he regarded Colon as a friend and had disclosed information about his visit to Long Island in May. The victim also mentioned that Colon and his father had aided him in remodeling his house. The warrant indicated that the homeowner stated that Matthew Colon had frequented his residence on numerous occasions and was fully aware of the surveillance camera system.

After being confronted with the victim's statements and the evidence pertaining to the burglary, Colon admitted to the police that he had been manipulated into becoming involved in the scheme by the third suspect. The warrant indicates that the authorities anticipate the imminent arrest of the third suspect.

The suspect's girlfriend was employed at the same home health care business as Colon and the victim from Windsor Locks. Lampson's warrant stated that other employees of the company had their homes in Massachusetts burglarized. One woman claimed that Colon had been at her residence to fix a gazebo before the break-in.

The warrant stated that cellphone records provided evidence of phone calls between Colon, Santiago, and the unidentified suspect both prior to and following the Windsor Locks burglary. The police have described the third suspect as a convicted felon with a significant criminal background, which includes armed robbery and a series of burglaries.

Santiago's extensive criminal record, as mentioned in the warrant, includes convictions for burglary and larceny in Connecticut. The Massachusetts investigators suspect his involvement in a criminal organization that specializes in targeted burglaries. Santiago has posted a bond of US$150,000 and is expected to make an appearance in the state Superior Court in Hartford on May 31. Similarly, Colon has posted a bond of US$100,000 and is scheduled to appear in court on May 2.